↓ Skip to main content

Annotation and curation of uncharacterized proteins- challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Annotation and curation of uncharacterized proteins- challenges
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2015.00119
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johny Ijaq, Mohanalatha Chandrasekharan, Rajdeep Poddar, Neeraja Bethi, Vijayaraghava S. Sundararajan

Abstract

Hypothetical proteins (HPs) are the proteins predicted to be expressed from an open reading frame, making a substantial fraction of proteomes in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Genome projects have led to the identification of many therapeutic targets, the putative function of the protein, and their interactions. In this review we enlist various methods linking annotation to structural and functional prediction of HPs that assist in the discovery of new structures and functions serving as markers and pharmacological targets for drug designing, discovery, and screening. Further we give an overview of how mass spectrometry as an analytical technique is used to validate protein characterisation. We discuss how microarrays and protein expression profiles help understanding the biological systems through a systems-wide study of proteins and their interactions with other proteins and non-proteinaceous molecules to control complex processes in cells. Finally, we articulate challenges on how next generation sequencing methods have accelerated multiple areas of genomics with special focus on uncharacterized proteins.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 174 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 17%
Student > Bachelor 25 14%
Researcher 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 54 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 4%
Computer Science 5 3%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 61 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2015.
All research outputs
#12,919,128
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#2,729
of 11,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,724
of 264,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#79
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,761 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.