↓ Skip to main content

A review of study designs and statistical methods for genomic epidemiology studies using next generation sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of study designs and statistical methods for genomic epidemiology studies using next generation sequencing
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2015.00149
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qian Wang, Qiongshi Lu, Hongyu Zhao

Abstract

Results from numerous linkage and association studies have greatly deepened scientists' understanding of the genetic basis of many human diseases, yet some important questions remain unanswered. For example, although a large number of disease-associated loci have been identified from genome-wide association studies in the past 10 years, it is challenging to interpret these results as most disease-associated markers have no clear functional roles in disease etiology, and all the identified genomic factors only explain a small portion of disease heritability. With the help of next-generation sequencing (NGS), diverse types of genomic and epigenetic variations can be detected with high accuracy. More importantly, instead of using linkage disequilibrium to detect association signals based on a set of pre-set probes, NGS allows researchers to directly study all the variants in each individual, therefore promises opportunities for identifying functional variants and a more comprehensive dissection of disease heritability. Although the current scale of NGS studies is still limited due to the high cost, the success of several recent studies suggests the great potential for applying NGS in genomic epidemiology, especially as the cost of sequencing continues to drop. In this review, we discuss several pioneer applications of NGS, summarize scientific discoveries for rare and complex diseases, and compare various study designs including targeted sequencing and whole-genome sequencing using population-based and family-based cohorts. Finally, we highlight recent advancements in statistical methods proposed for sequencing analysis, including group-based association tests, meta-analysis techniques, and annotation tools for variant prioritization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 157 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 21%
Student > Master 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 9 5%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 27 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 14%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 35 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2015.
All research outputs
#3,747,453
of 25,390,970 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,179
of 13,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,234
of 278,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#19
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,970 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,673 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.