You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The role of long non-coding RNAs in genome formatting and expression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2015.00165 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pierre-Olivier Angrand, Constance Vennin, Xuefen Le Bourhis, Eric Adriaenssens |
| Abstract |
Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are transcripts without protein-coding potential but having a pivotal role in numerous biological functions. Long non-coding RNAs act as regulators at different levels of gene expression including chromatin organization, transcriptional regulation, and post-transcriptional control. Misregulation of lncRNAs expression has been found to be associated to cancer and other human disorders. Here, we review the different types of lncRNAs, their mechanisms of action on genome formatting and expression and emphasized on the multifaceted action of the H19 lncRNA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 26% |
| Researcher | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 19% |
| Unknown | 19 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 49 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2015.
All research outputs
#6,416,875
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,964
of 11,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,574
of 264,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#48
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.