↓ Skip to main content

Sites of instability in the human TCF3 (E2A) gene adopt G-quadruplex DNA structures in vitro

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sites of instability in the human TCF3 (E2A) gene adopt G-quadruplex DNA structures in vitro
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2015.00177
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan D. Williams, Sara Fleetwood, Alexandra Berroyer, Nayun Kim, Erik D. Larson

Abstract

The formation of highly stable four-stranded DNA, called G-quadruplex (G4), promotes site-specific genome instability. G4 DNA structures fold from repetitive guanine sequences, and increasing experimental evidence connects G4 sequence motifs with specific gene rearrangements. The human transcription factor 3 (TCF3) gene (also termed E2A) is subject to genetic instability associated with severe disease, most notably a common translocation event t(1;19) associated with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The sites of instability in TCF3 are not randomly distributed, but focused to certain sequences. We asked if G4 DNA formation could explain why TCF3 is prone to recombination and mutagenesis. Here we demonstrate that sequences surrounding the major t(1;19) break site and a region associated with copy number variations both contain G4 sequence motifs. The motifs identified readily adopt G4 DNA structures that are stable enough to interfere with DNA synthesis in physiological salt conditions in vitro. When introduced into the yeast genome, TCF3 G4 motifs promoted gross chromosomal rearrangements in a transcription-dependent manner. Our results provide a molecular rationale for the site-specific instability of human TCF3, suggesting that G4 DNA structures contribute to oncogenic DNA breaks and recombination.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 29%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 17%
Chemistry 3 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2015.
All research outputs
#17,756,606
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#6,062
of 11,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,527
of 264,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#94
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.