↓ Skip to main content

Future opportunities and trends for e-infrastructures and life sciences: going beyond the grid to enable life science data analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Future opportunities and trends for e-infrastructures and life sciences: going beyond the grid to enable life science data analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2015.00197
Pubmed ID
Authors

Afonso M. S. Duarte, Fotis E. Psomopoulos, Christophe Blanchet, Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin, Manuel Corpas, Alain Franc, Rafael C. Jimenez, Jesus M. de Lucas, Tommi Nyrönen, Gergely Sipos, Stephanie B. Suhr

Abstract

With the increasingly rapid growth of data in life sciences we are witnessing a major transition in the way research is conducted, from hypothesis-driven studies to data-driven simulations of whole systems. Such approaches necessitate the use of large-scale computational resources and e-infrastructures, such as the European Grid Infrastructure (EGI). EGI, one of key the enablers of the digital European Research Area, is a federation of resource providers set up to deliver sustainable, integrated and secure computing services to European researchers and their international partners. Here we aim to provide the state of the art of Grid/Cloud computing in EU research as viewed from within the field of life sciences, focusing on key infrastructures and projects within the life sciences community. Rather than focusing purely on the technical aspects underlying the currently provided solutions, we outline the design aspects and key characteristics that can be identified across major research approaches. Overall, we aim to provide significant insights into the road ahead by establishing ever-strengthening connections between EGI as a whole and the life sciences community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
Netherlands 1 4%
Italy 1 4%
Greece 1 4%
Unknown 23 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 43%
Student > Master 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 32%
Computer Science 6 21%
Chemistry 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2015.
All research outputs
#12,630,734
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#2,529
of 11,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,506
of 263,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#39
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.