↓ Skip to main content

Integrated Systems for NGS Data Management and Analysis: Open Issues and Available Solutions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrated Systems for NGS Data Management and Analysis: Open Issues and Available Solutions
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, May 2016
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2016.00075
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valerio Bianchi, Arnaud Ceol, Alessandro G. E. Ogier, Stefano de Pretis, Eugenia Galeota, Kamal Kishore, Pranami Bora, Ottavio Croci, Stefano Campaner, Bruno Amati, Marco J. Morelli, Mattia Pelizzola

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have deeply changed our understanding of cellular processes by delivering an astonishing amount of data at affordable prices; nowadays, many biology laboratories have already accumulated a large number of sequenced samples. However, managing and analyzing these data poses new challenges, which may easily be underestimated by research groups devoid of IT and quantitative skills. In this perspective, we identify five issues that should be carefully addressed by research groups approaching NGS technologies. In particular, the five key issues to be considered concern: (1) adopting a laboratory management system (LIMS) and safeguard the resulting raw data structure in downstream analyses; (2) monitoring the flow of the data and standardizing input and output directories and file names, even when multiple analysis protocols are used on the same data; (3) ensuring complete traceability of the analysis performed; (4) enabling non-experienced users to run analyses through a graphical user interface (GUI) acting as a front-end for the pipelines; (5) relying on standard metadata to annotate the datasets, and when possible using controlled vocabularies, ideally derived from biomedical ontologies. Finally, we discuss the currently available tools in the light of these issues, and we introduce HTS-flow, a new workflow management system conceived to address the concerns we raised. HTS-flow is able to retrieve information from a LIMS database, manages data analyses through a simple GUI, outputs data in standard locations and allows the complete traceability of datasets, accompanying metadata and analysis scripts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
France 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
China 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 90 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 20%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 4 4%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 25%
Computer Science 10 10%
Engineering 8 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2016.
All research outputs
#3,356,010
of 24,336,902 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#960
of 13,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,296
of 303,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#10
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,336,902 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,084 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.