↓ Skip to main content

DNA Damage Response and Immune Defense: Links and Mechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DNA Damage Response and Immune Defense: Links and Mechanisms
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, August 2016
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2016.00147
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rania Nakad, Björn Schumacher

Abstract

DNA damage plays a causal role in numerous human pathologies including cancer, premature aging, and chronic inflammatory conditions. In response to genotoxic insults, the DNA damage response (DDR) orchestrates DNA damage checkpoint activation and facilitates the removal of DNA lesions. The DDR can also arouse the immune system by for example inducing the expression of antimicrobial peptides as well as ligands for receptors found on immune cells. The activation of immune signaling is triggered by different components of the DDR including DNA damage sensors, transducer kinases, and effectors. In this review, we describe recent advances on the understanding of the role of DDR in activating immune signaling. We highlight evidence gained into (i) which molecular and cellular pathways of DDR activate immune signaling, (ii) how DNA damage drives chronic inflammation, and (iii) how chronic inflammation causes DNA damage and pathology in humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 259 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 17%
Researcher 35 13%
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Other 14 5%
Other 45 17%
Unknown 69 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 79 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 14 5%
Unknown 79 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,808,489
of 24,703,227 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,997
of 13,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,346
of 369,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#14
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,703,227 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,311 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.