You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Genetics of Tinnitus: Time to Biobank Phantom Sounds
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, September 2017
|
DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2017.00110 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christopher R. Cederroth, Anna K. Kähler, Patrick F. Sullivan, Jose A. Lopez-Escamez |
Abstract |
Tinnitus is a common phantom sensation resulting most often from sensory deprivation, and for which little knowledge on the molecular mechanisms exists. While the existing evidence for a genetic influence on the condition has been until now sparse and underpowered, recent data suggest that specific forms of tinnitus have a strong genetic component revealing that not all tinnitus percepts are alike, at least in how they are genetically driven. These new findings pave the way for a better understanding on how phantom sensations are molecularly driven and call for international biobanking efforts. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 27 | 43% |
United States | 3 | 5% |
Germany | 3 | 5% |
Ireland | 2 | 3% |
Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
Greece | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 24 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 56 | 89% |
Scientists | 4 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 16% |
Researcher | 4 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
Professor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 32% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
Psychology | 2 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2018.
All research outputs
#893,919
of 25,547,904 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#138
of 13,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,214
of 324,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#5
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,547,904 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.