↓ Skip to main content

Genomic Analysis Revealed New Oncogenic Signatures in TP53-Mutant Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genomic Analysis Revealed New Oncogenic Signatures in TP53-Mutant Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2018.00002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Venkatesh Kancherla, Samir Abdullazade, Matthias S. Matter, Manuela Lanzafame, Luca Quagliata, Guglielmo Roma, Yujin Hoshida, Luigi M. Terracciano, Charlotte K. Y. Ng, Salvatore Piscuoglio

Abstract

TheTP53gene is the most commonly mutated gene in human cancers and mutations inTP53have been shown to have either gain-of-function or loss-of-function effects. Using the data generated by The Cancer Genome Atlas, we sought to define the spectrum ofTP53mutations in hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and their association with clinicopathologic features, and to determine the oncogenic and mutational signatures inTP53-mutant HCCs. Compared to other cancer types, HCCs harbored distinctive mutation hotspots at V157 and R249, whereas common mutation hotspots in other cancer types, R175 and R273, were extremely rare in HCCs. In terms of clinicopathologic features, in addition to the associations with chronic viral infection and high Edmondson grade, we found thatTP53somatic mutations were less frequent in HCCs with cholestasis or tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, but were more frequent in HCCs displaying necrotic areas. An analysis of the oncogenic signatures based on the genetic alterations found in genes recurrently altered in HCCs identified four distinctTP53-mutant subsets, three of which were defined byCTNNB1mutations, 1q amplifications or 8q24 amplifications, respectively, that co-occurred withTP53mutations. We also found that mutational signature 12, a liver cancer-specific signature characterized by T>C substitutions, was prevalent in HCCs with wild-typeTP53or with missenseTP53mutations, but not in HCCs with deleteriousTP53mutations. Finally, whereas patients with HCCs harboring deleteriousTP53mutations had worse overall and disease-free survival than patients withTP53-wild-type HCCs, patients with HCCs harboring missenseTP53mutations did not have worse prognosis. In conclusion, our results highlight the importance to consider the genetic heterogeneity amongTP53-mutant HCCs in studies of biomarkers and molecular characterization of HCCs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Bachelor 8 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 15 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,864,700
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,520
of 12,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,401
of 441,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#22
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,604 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.