↓ Skip to main content

New Insights on Water Buffalo Genomic Diversity and Post-Domestication Migration Routes From Medium Density SNP Chip Data

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New Insights on Water Buffalo Genomic Diversity and Post-Domestication Migration Routes From Medium Density SNP Chip Data
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2018.00053
Pubmed ID
Authors

Licia Colli, Marco Milanesi, Elia Vajana, Daniela Iamartino, Lorenzo Bomba, Francesco Puglisi, Marcello Del Corvo, Ezequiel L Nicolazzi, Sahar S E Ahmed, Jesus R V Herrera, Libertado Cruz, Shujun Zhang, Aixin Liang, Guohua Hua, Liguo Yang, Xingjie Hao, Fuyuan Zuo, Song-Jia Lai, Shuilian Wang, Ruyu Liu, Yundeng Gong, Mahdi Mokhber, Yongjiang Mao, Feng Guan, Augustin Vlaic, Bogdan Vlaic, Luigi Ramunno, Gianfranco Cosenza, Ali Ahmad, Ihsan Soysal, Emel Ö Ünal, Mariena Ketudat-Cairns, José F Garcia, Yuri T Utsunomiya, Pietro S Baruselli, Maria E J Amaral, Rangsun Parnpai, Marcela G Drummond, Peter Galbusera, James Burton, Eileen Hoal, Yulnawati Yusnizar, Cece Sumantri, Bianca Moioli, Alessio Valentini, Alessandra Stella, John L Williams, Paolo Ajmone-Marsan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Master 10 9%
Other 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 33 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 39 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,162,245
of 25,350,078 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#493
of 13,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,747
of 338,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#9
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,350,078 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.