↓ Skip to main content

Micropeptides Encoded in Transcripts Previously Identified as Long Noncoding RNAs: A New Chapter in Transcriptomics and Proteomics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Micropeptides Encoded in Transcripts Previously Identified as Long Noncoding RNAs: A New Chapter in Transcriptomics and Proteomics
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, April 2018
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2018.00144
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fouzia Yeasmin, Tetsushi Yada, Nobuyoshi Akimitsu

Abstract

Integrative analysis using omics-based technologies results in the identification of a large number of putative short open reading frames (sORFs) with protein-coding capacity within transcripts previously identified as long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) or transcripts of unknown function (TUFs). sORFs were previously overlooked because of their diminutive size and the difficulty of identification by bioinformatics analyses. There is now growing evidence of the existence of potentially functional micropeptides produced from sORFs within cells of diverse species. Recent characterization of a few of these revealed their significant divergent roles in many fundamental biological processes, where some also show important relationships with pathogenesis. Recent works therefore provide new insights for exploring the wealth of information that may lie within sORF-encoded short proteins. Here, we summarize the current progress and view of micropeptides encoded in sORFs of protein-coding genes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 143 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 20%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 34 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 53 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Computer Science 5 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 37 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,716,938
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,125
of 12,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,441
of 326,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#18
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,100 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.