↓ Skip to main content

PIBLUP: High-Performance Software for Large-Scale Genetic Evaluation of Animals and Plants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PIBLUP: High-Performance Software for Large-Scale Genetic Evaluation of Animals and Plants
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2018.00226
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huimin Kang, Chao Ning, Lei Zhou, Shengli Zhang, Ning Yang, Jian-Feng Liu

Abstract

Today, the rapid increase in phenotypic and genotypic information is leading to larger mixed model equations (MMEs) and rendering genetic evaluation more time-consuming. It has been demonstrated that a preconditioned conjugate gradient (PCG) algorithm via an iteration on data (IOD) technique is the most efficient method of solving MME at a low computing cost. Commonly used software applications implementing PCG by IOD merely employ functions from the Intel Math Kernel Library (MKL) to accelerate numerical computations and have not taken full advantage of the multicores or multiprocessors of computer systems to reduce the execution time. Making the most of multicore/multiprocessor systems, we propose PIBLUP, a parallel, shared memory implementation of PCG by IOD to minimize the execution time of genetic evaluation. In addition to functions in MKL, PIBLUP uses Message Passing Interface (MPI) shared memory programming to parallelize code in the entire workflow where possible. Results from the analysis of the two datasets show that the execution time was reduced by more than 80% when solving MME using PIBLUP with 16 processes in parallel, compared to a serial program using a single process. PIBLUP is a high-performance tool for users to efficiently perform genetic evaluation. PIBLUP with its user manual is available at https://github.com/huiminkang/PIBLUP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Other 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 50%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,345,702
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#6,355
of 12,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,749
of 332,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#135
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,603 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.