↓ Skip to main content

Identification and Analysis of Blood Gene Expression Signature for Osteoarthritis With Advanced Feature Selection Methods

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification and Analysis of Blood Gene Expression Signature for Osteoarthritis With Advanced Feature Selection Methods
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2018.00246
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Li, Chun-Na Lan, Ying Kong, Song-Shan Feng, Tao Huang

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a complex disease that affects articular joints and may cause disability. The incidence of OA is extremely high. Most elderly people have the symptoms of osteoarthritis. The physiotherapy of OA is time consuming, and the chances of full recovery from OA are very minimal. The most effective way of fighting OA is early diagnosis and early intervention. Liquid biopsy has become a popular noninvasive test. To find the blood gene expression signature for OA, we reanalyzed the publicly available blood gene expression profiles of 106 patients with OA and 33 control samples using an automatic computational pipeline based on advanced feature selection methods. Finally, a compact 23-gene set was identified. On the basis of these 23 genes, we constructed a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier and evaluated it with leave-one-out cross-validation. Its sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), accuracy (ACC), and Mathew's correlation coefficient (MCC) were 0.991, 0.909, 0.971, and 0.920, respectively. Obviously, the performance needed to be validated in an independent large dataset, but the in-depth biological analysis of the 23 biomarkers showed great promise and suggested that mRNA surveillance pathway and multicellular organism growth played important roles in OA. Our results shed light on OA diagnosis through liquid biopsy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 14 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,544,609
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#5,533
of 12,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,803
of 334,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#125
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,152 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.