↓ Skip to main content

Human BCDIN3D Is a Cytoplasmic tRNAHis-Specific 5′-Monophosphate Methyltransferase

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human BCDIN3D Is a Cytoplasmic tRNAHis-Specific 5′-Monophosphate Methyltransferase
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2018.00305
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kozo Tomita, Yining Liu

Abstract

Bicoid interacting 3 domain containing RNA methyltransferase (BCDIN3D) is a member of the Bin3 methyltransferase family and is evolutionary conserved from worm to human. BCDIN3D is overexpressed in breast cancer, which is associated with poor prognosis of breast cancers. However, the biological functions and properties of BCDIN3D have been enigmatic. Recent studies have revealed that human BCDIN3D monomethylates 5'-monophsosphate of cytoplasmic tRNAHisin vivo and in vitro. BCDIN3D recognizes the unique and exceptional structural features of cytoplasmic tRNAHis and discriminates tRNAHis from other cytoplasmic tRNA species. Thus, BCDIN3D is a tRNAHis-specific 5'-monophosphate methyltransferase. Methylation of the 5'-phosphate group of tRNAHis does not significantly affect tRNAHis aminoacylation by histidyl-tRNA synthetase in vitro nor the steady state level or stability of tRNAHisin vivo. Hence, methylation of the 5'-phosphate group of tRNAHis by BCDIN3D or tRNAHis itself may be involved in certain unknown biological processes, beyond protein synthesis. This review discusses recent reports on BCDIN3D and the possible association between 5'-phosphate monomethylation of tRNAHis and the tumorigenic phenotype of breast cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,645,475
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#7,177
of 12,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,520
of 331,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#133
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,152 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.