↓ Skip to main content

Timing of Expansion of Fragile X Premutation Alleles During Intergenerational Transmission in a Mouse Model of the Fragile X-Related Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Timing of Expansion of Fragile X Premutation Alleles During Intergenerational Transmission in a Mouse Model of the Fragile X-Related Disorders
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2018.00314
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiao-Nan Zhao, Karen Usdin

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is caused by the maternal expansion of an unstable CGG-repeat tract located in the first exon of the FMR1 gene. Further changes in repeat number occur during embryogenesis resulting in individuals sometimes being highly mosaic. Here we show in a mouse model that, in males, expansions are already present in primary spermatocytes with no additional expansions occurring in later stages of gametogenesis. We also show that, in females, expansion occurs in the post-natal oocyte. Additional expansions and a high frequency of large contractions are seen in two-cell stage embryos. Expansion in oocytes, which are non-dividing, would be consistent with a mechanism involving aberrant DNA repair or recombination rather than a problem with chromosomal replication. Given the difficulty of replicating large CGG-repeat tracts, we speculate that very large expanded alleles may be prone to contract in the mitotically proliferating spermatagonial stem cells in men. However, expanded alleles may not be under such pressure in the non-dividing oocyte. The high degree of both expansions and contractions seen in early embryos may contribute to the high frequency of somatic mosaicism that is observed in humans. Our data thus suggest an explanation for the fact that FXS is exclusively maternally transmitted and lend support to models for repeat expansion that are based on problems arising during DNA repair.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Master 6 21%
Researcher 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,646,262
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#7,177
of 12,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,705
of 331,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#141
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,152 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.