You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Whole Exome Sequencing Is the Preferred Strategy to Identify the Genetic Defect in Patients With a Probable or Possible Mitochondrial Cause
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2018.00400 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tom E. J. Theunissen, Minh Nguyen, Rick Kamps, Alexandra T. Hendrickx, Suzanne C. E. H. Sallevelt, Ralph W. H. Gottschalk, Chantal M. Calis, Alphons P. M. Stassen, Bart de Koning, Elvira N. M. Mulder-Den Hartog, Kees Schoonderwoerd, Sabine A. Fuchs, Yvonne Hilhorst-Hofstee, Marianne de Visser, Jo Vanoevelen, Radek Szklarczyk, Mike Gerards, Irenaeus F. M. de Coo, Debby M. E. I. Hellebrekers, Hubert J. M. Smeets |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| United States | 3 | 20% |
| Mexico | 2 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 17% |
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,936,378
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#439
of 12,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,838
of 348,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#16
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,604 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.