You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cryptic Diversity, but to What Extent? Discordance Between Single-Locus Species Delimitation Methods Within Mainland Anoles (Squamata: Dactyloidae) of Northern Central America
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2019.00011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erich P. Hofmann, Kirsten E. Nicholson, Ileana R. Luque-Montes, Gunther Köhler, César A. Cerrato-Mendoza, Melissa Medina-Flores, Larry David Wilson, Josiah H. Townsend |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#18,985,884
of 23,538,320 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#7,401
of 12,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#332,421
of 448,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#233
of 327 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,538,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,563 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 327 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.