You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Natural Selection Equally Supports the Human Tendencies in Subordination and Domination: A Genome-Wide Study With in silico Confirmation and in vivo Validation in Mice
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2019.00073 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Irina Chadaeva, Petr Ponomarenko, Dmitry Rasskazov, Ekaterina Sharypova, Elena Kashina, Maxim Kleshchev, Mikhail Ponomarenko, Vladimir Naumenko, Ludmila Savinkova, Nikolay Kolchanov, Ludmila Osadchuk, Alexandr Osadchuk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Finland | 1 | 20% |
Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 6 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
Researcher | 4 | 13% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 6 | 19% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2020.
All research outputs
#13,402,540
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#3,017
of 12,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,459
of 352,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#121
of 374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,169 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.