↓ Skip to main content

Enabling Global Clinical Collaborations on Identifiable Patient Data: The Minerva Initiative

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enabling Global Clinical Collaborations on Identifiable Patient Data: The Minerva Initiative
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, July 2019
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2019.00611
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoffer Nellåker, Fowzan S. Alkuraya, Gareth Baynam, Raphael A. Bernier, Francois P.J. Bernier, Vanessa Boulanger, Michael Brudno, Han G. Brunner, Jill Clayton-Smith, Benjamin Cogné, Hugh J.S. Dawkins, Bert B.A. deVries, Sofia Douzgou, Tracy Dudding-Byth, Evan E. Eichler, Michael Ferlaino, Karen Fieggen, Helen V. Firth, David R. FitzPatrick, Dylan Gration, Tudor Groza, Melissa Haendel, Nina Hallowell, Ada Hamosh, Jayne Hehir-Kwa, Marc-Phillip Hitz, Mark Hughes, Usha Kini, Tjitske Kleefstra, R Frank Kooy, Peter Krawitz, Sébastien Küry, Melissa Lees, Gholson J. Lyon, Stanislas Lyonnet, Julien L. Marcadier, Stephen Meyn, Veronika Moslerová, Juan M. Politei, Cathryn C. Poulton, F Lucy Raymond, Margot R.F. Reijnders, Peter N. Robinson, Corrado Romano, Catherine M. Rose, David C.G. Sainsbury, Lyn Schofield, Vernon R. Sutton, Marek Turnovec, Anke Van Dijck, Hilde Van Esch, Andrew O.M. Wilkie, The Minerva Consortium

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 12%
Other 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 32 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 35 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,345,632
of 23,151,828 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#2,337
of 12,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,566
of 346,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#72
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,190 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.