You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genomic Information for Clinicians in the Electronic Health Record: Lessons Learned From the Clinical Genome Resource Project and the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics Network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2019.01059 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marc S. Williams, Casey Overby Taylor, Nephi A. Walton, Scott R. Goehringer, Samuel Aronson, Robert R. Freimuth, Luke V. Rasmussen, Eric S. Hall, Cynthia A. Prows, Wendy K. Chung, Alexander Fedotov, Jordan Nestor, Chunhua Weng, Robb K. Rowley, Georgia L. Wiesner, Gail P. Jarvik, Guilherme Del Fiol |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| Ireland | 1 | 11% |
| Kenya | 1 | 11% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 24% |
| Unknown | 22 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,405,699
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#588
of 12,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,272
of 363,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#36
of 414 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,321 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 414 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.