↓ Skip to main content

The African Genomic Medicine Training Initiative (AGMT): Showcasing a Community and Framework Driven Genomic Medicine Training for Nurses in Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
31 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The African Genomic Medicine Training Initiative (AGMT): Showcasing a Community and Framework Driven Genomic Medicine Training for Nurses in Africa
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, December 2019
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2019.01209
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victoria Nembaware, African Genomic Medicine Training Initiative, Nicola Mulder, Omar Abidi, MB Akanle, Stuart Alvaro Ali, Cliff Asher Aliga, Paballo Chauke, Minnet Cotzee, Collet Dandara, Faisal M. Fadlelmola, Michael B. Fawale, Pedro L. Fernandes, Karen Ghansah, Zainab Abimbola Kashim, Samar Kamal Kassim, Morenikeji A. Komolafe, Guida Landouré, Cordelia Leisegang, Ebony B Madden, Kuda Majada, Malebo Malope, Mamadou Kaba, Keofentse Mathuba, Alice Matimba, George Mochamah, Sarah L Morgan, Nicola Mulder, Nash Oyekanmi, Nchangwi S Munung, Victoria Nembaware, Temitope Esther Owoeye, Michael Sean Pepper, Lunelle Pienaar, Elize Pietersen, Fouzia Radouani, Raj S Ramesar, Michelle Skelton, Sununguko Wata Mpoloka, Wayengerera Misaki, Ambroise Wonkam, Adetunji Samuel Adesina, Tina-Marié Wessels

Abstract

The potential of genomic medicine in improving the quality of healthcare both at population and individual-level is well-recognized globally. However, successful adoption of genetic and genomic evidence into clinical practice depends on training the healthcare workforce and clinical researchers in genomic medicine. Due to limited expertise in the medical genetics and genomics field, widespread uptake largely depends on task-shifting for the implementation of genomic medicine implementation to key healthcare professionals such as nurses. Their knowledge would be developed through courses aimed at professional development. Globally, trainers, and training initiatives in genomic medicine are in early stages of development, but resource limited settings such as the African continent face additional logistical and institutional challenges. The African Genomic Medicine Training (AGMT) Initiative was conceived during a combined conference of the African Society of Human Genetics (AfSHG) and the Human Heredity and Health in Africa Consortium (H3Africa) in 2016, Senegal, in response to the needs for developing knowledge and skills in genomic medicine. AGMT was established to implement a sustainable genomic medicine training initiative primarily for healthcare professionals who are not geneticists but are nurses, doctors, and pharmacists in Africa. This paper reports on the establishment of the AGMT initiative and the strategies developed and piloted by this initiative in designing and implementing an accredited frame-work and community-based blended learning course for nurses across 11 African countries. The global implementation experiences, outcomes and lessons learnt are highlighted. The AGMT initiative strategy takes advantage of existing research consortia and networks to train and create a pool of trainers and has adopted evidence-based approaches to guide curriculum and content development/adaptation. This initiative established the first Africa-wide online blended learning genomic medicine course which forms the basis from which to develop courses for other healthcare professionals and the wider public.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Master 9 12%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 26 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 12%
Social Sciences 7 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 29 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,570,966
of 24,561,012 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#318
of 13,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,008
of 468,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#10
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,561,012 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,237 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 468,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.