You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Genetic Landscape of Dystrophin Mutations in Italy: A Nationwide Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2020.00131 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcella Neri, Rachele Rossi, Cecilia Trabanelli, Antonio Mauro, Rita Selvatici, Maria Sofia Falzarano, Noemi Spedicato, Alice Margutti, Paola Rimessi, Fernanda Fortunato, Marina Fabris, Francesca Gualandi, Giacomo Comi, Silvana Tedeschi, Manuela Seia, Chiara Fiorillo, Monica Traverso, Claudio Bruno, Emiliano Giardina, Maria Rosaria Piemontese, Giuseppe Merla, Milena Cau, Monica Marica, Carmela Scuderi, Eugenia Borgione, Alessandra Tessa, Guia Astrea, Filippo Maria Santorelli, Luciano Merlini, Marina Mora, Pia Bernasconi, Sara Gibertini, Valeria Sansone, Tiziana Mongini, Angela Berardinelli, Antonella Pini, Rocco Liguori, Massimiliano Filosto, Sonia Messina, Gianluca Vita, Antonio Toscano, Giuseppe Vita, Marika Pane, Serenella Servidei, Elena Pegoraro, Luca Bello, Lorena Travaglini, Enrico Bertini, Adele D'Amico, Manuela Ergoli, Luisa Politano, Annalaura Torella, Vincenzo Nigro, Eugenio Mercuri, Alessandra Ferlini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 32 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#8,106
of 13,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,220
of 388,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#229
of 388 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,785 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 388 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.