You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Structure‒function‒pathogenicity analysis of C-terminal myocilin missense variants based on experiments and 3D models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2022.1019208 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Biting Zhou, Xiaojia Lin, Zhong Li, Yihua Yao, Juhua Yang, Yihua Zhu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#20,861,471
of 23,476,369 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#8,984
of 12,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#354,112
of 443,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#671
of 1,135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,476,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,494 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.