↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic value of nutritional and inflammatory indicators in females with esophageal squamous cell cancer: A propensity score matching study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic value of nutritional and inflammatory indicators in females with esophageal squamous cell cancer: A propensity score matching study
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, October 2022
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2022.1026685
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuping Li, Huaichao Luo, Bo Ye, Kaijiong Zhang, Chang Liu, Ruiling Zu, Sujiao Ni, Qiao He, Lubei Rao, Qifeng Wang, Dongsheng Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2022.
All research outputs
#20,453,782
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#8,716
of 12,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#349,007
of 439,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#571
of 953 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,067 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 953 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.