↓ Skip to main content

Biomolecular Prospecting, Informative Gaps, and the Cancer Clinic: A Qualitative Fieldwork and an Epistemological, Historical and Ethical Analysis of Informed Consent for Clinical Trials for…

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biomolecular Prospecting, Informative Gaps, and the Cancer Clinic: A Qualitative Fieldwork and an Epistemological, Historical and Ethical Analysis of Informed Consent for Clinical Trials for Monoclonal Antibodies and Biobank Research
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, June 2022
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2022.872211
Pubmed ID
Authors

Flavio D’Abramo, Annemieke Bont, Lisa Nüßlein

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2022.
All research outputs
#21,391,516
of 23,884,161 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#9,117
of 12,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#360,598
of 428,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#523
of 894 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,884,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,832 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 894 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.