↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic value of autophagy-related genes based on single-cell RNA-sequencing in colorectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic value of autophagy-related genes based on single-cell RNA-sequencing in colorectal cancer
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, March 2023
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2023.1109683
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuqi Luo, Xuesong Deng, Weihua Liao, Yiwen Huang, Caijie Lu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#16,106,173
of 24,506,807 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#4,873
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,966
of 405,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#125
of 533 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,506,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 533 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.