↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Molecular systematics and phylogeography of tropical and subtropical biodiversity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Molecular systematics and phylogeography of tropical and subtropical biodiversity
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, December 2023
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2023.1345239
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victor Hugo Valiati, Fernando Lopes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2023.
All research outputs
#15,488,327
of 25,002,811 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#3,919
of 13,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,261
of 189,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#18
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,002,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,468 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.