You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Case report: Novel SIN3A loss-of-function variant as causative for hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in Witteveen–Kolk syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2024.1354715 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lourdes Correa Brito, Ana Keselman, Florencia Villegas, Paula Scaglia, María Esnaola Azcoiti, Sebastián Castro, Nora Sanguineti, Agustín Izquierdo, Marianela Maier, Ignacio Bergadá, Claudia Arberas, Rodolfo A. Rey, María Gabriela Ropelato |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Argentina | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#16,786,929
of 25,464,544 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#5,053
of 13,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,530
of 151,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#25
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,464,544 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,724 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.