You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional analysis of RRAS2 pathogenic variants with a Noonan-like phenotype
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2024.1383176 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takaya Iida, Arisa Igarashi, Kae Fukunaga, Taiga Aoki, Tomomi Hidai, Kumiko Yanagi, Masahiko Yamamori, Kazuhito Satou, Hayato Go, Tomoki Kosho, Ryuto Maki, Takashi Suzuki, Yohei Nitta, Atsushi Sugie, Yoichi Asaoka, Makoto Furutani-Seiki, Tetsuaki Kimura, Yoichi Matsubara, Tadashi Kaname |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#20,818,045
of 25,578,098 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#8,046
of 13,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,180
of 154,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#38
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,578,098 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,764 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.