You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Use of implementation science to advance family planning programs in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Global Women's Health, December 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fgwh.2022.1038297 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Colin Baynes, Petrus Steyn, Caroline Soi, Aneth Dinis, Stelio Tembe, Hedieh Mehrtash, Manjulaa Narasimhan, James Kiarie, Kenneth Sherr |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 29% |
Zimbabwe | 1 | 14% |
France | 1 | 14% |
Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
Researcher | 3 | 9% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 19 | 58% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 19 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,121,354
of 25,359,594 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Global Women's Health
#128
of 482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,578
of 487,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Global Women's Health
#8
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,359,594 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 487,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.