You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases: An Update on the Classification from the International Union of Immunological Societies Expert Committee for Primary Immunodeficiency
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2011.00054 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Waleed Al-Herz, Aziz Bousfiha, Jean-Laurent Casanova, Helen Chapel, Mary Ellen Conley, Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles, Amos Etzioni, Alain Fischer, Jose Luis Franco, Raif S. Geha, Lennart Hammarström, Shigeaki Nonoyama, Luigi Daniele Notarangelo, Hans Dieter Ochs, Jennifer M. Puck, Chaim M. Roifman, Reinhard Seger, Mimi L. K. Tang |
| Abstract |
We report the updated classification of primary immunodeficiency diseases, compiled by the ad hoc Expert Committee of the International Union of Immunological Societies. As compared to the previous edition, more than 15 novel disease entities have been added in the updated version. For each disorders, the key clinical and laboratory features are provided. This updated classification is meant to help in the diagnostic approach to patients with these diseases. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Romania | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 214 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 13% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 63 | 29% |
| Unknown | 28 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 98 | 45% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 36 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2014.
All research outputs
#2,307,637
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#2,244
of 31,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,526
of 190,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#3
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.