↓ Skip to main content

Akt and mTOR in B Cell Activation and Differentiation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
290 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Akt and mTOR in B Cell Activation and Differentiation
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00228
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jose J. Limon, David A. Fruman

Abstract

Activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) is required for B cell proliferation and survival. PI3K signaling also controls key aspects of B cell differentiation. Upon engagement of the B cell receptor (BCR), PI3K activation promotes Ca(2+) mobilization and activation of NFκB-dependent transcription, events which are essential for B cell proliferation. PI3K also initiates a distinct signaling pathway involving the Akt and mTOR serine/threonine kinases. It has been generally assumed that activation of Akt and mTOR downstream of PI3K is essential for B cell function. However, Akt and mTOR have complex roles in B cell fate decisions and suppression of this pathway can enhance certain B cell responses while repressing others. In this review we will discuss genetic and pharmacological studies of Akt and mTOR function in normal B cells, and in malignancies of B cell origin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 282 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 26%
Researcher 59 20%
Student > Master 33 11%
Student > Bachelor 31 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 36 12%
Unknown 44 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 90 31%
Immunology and Microbiology 50 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 12%
Chemistry 3 1%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 51 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,417,764
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#2,373
of 31,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,392
of 250,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#10
of 275 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 275 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.