↓ Skip to main content

Competition for IL-2 between Regulatory and Effector T Cells to Chisel Immune Responses

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Competition for IL-2 between Regulatory and Effector T Cells to Chisel Immune Responses
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00268
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Höfer, Oleg Krichevsky, Grégoire Altan-Bonnet

Abstract

In this review we discuss how the competition for cytokines between different cells of the immune system can shape the system wide immune response. We focus on interleukin-2 (IL-2) secretion by activated effector T cells (T(eff)) and on the competition for IL-2 consumption between T(eff) and regulatory T cells (T(reg)). We discuss the evidence for the mechanism in which the depletion of IL-2 by T(reg) cells would be sufficient to suppress an autoimmune response, yet not strong enough to prevent an immune response. We present quantitative estimations and summarize our modeling effort to show that the tug-of-war between T(reg) and T(eff) cells for IL-2 molecules can be won by T(reg) cells in the case of weak activation of T(eff) leading to the suppression of the immune response. Or, for strongly activated T(eff) cells, it can be won by T(eff) cells bringing about the activation of the whole adaptive immune system. Finally, we discuss some recent applications attempting to achieve clinical effects through the modulation of IL-2 consumption by T(reg) compartment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 129 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 22%
Researcher 27 20%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 28%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Physics and Astronomy 5 4%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 28 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2012.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#27,414
of 31,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,476
of 250,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#161
of 275 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 275 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.