↓ Skip to main content

Illuminating the dynamics of signal integration in Natural Killer cells

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Illuminating the dynamics of signal integration in Natural Killer cells
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00308
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie V. Pageon, Dominika Rudnicka, Daniel M. Davis

Abstract

Natural Killer (NK) cell responses are shaped by the integration of signals transduced from multiple activating and inhibitory receptors at their surface. Biochemical and genetic approaches have identified most of the key proteins involved in signal integration but a major challenge remains in understanding how the spatial and temporal dynamics of their interactions lead to NK cells responding appropriately when encountering ligands on target cells. Well over a decade of research using fluorescence microscopy has revealed much about the architecture of the NK cell immune synapse - the structured interface between NK cells and target cells - and how it varies when inhibition or activation is the outcome of signal integration. However, key questions - such as the proximity of individual activating and inhibitory receptors - have remained unanswered because the resolution of optical microscopy has been insufficient, being limited by diffraction. Recent developments in fluorescence microscopy have broken this limit, seeding new opportunities for studying the nanometer-scale organization of the NK cell immune synapse. Here, we discuss how these new technologies, super-resolution imaging and other novel light-based methods, can illuminate our understanding of NK cell biology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 6%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 31 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Professor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2012.
All research outputs
#14,807,956
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#12,959
of 31,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,899
of 250,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#100
of 275 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 275 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.