↓ Skip to main content

Toward a Refined Definition of Monocyte Subsets

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
255 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
335 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Toward a Refined Definition of Monocyte Subsets
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Loems Ziegler-Heitbrock, Thomas P. J. Hofer

Abstract

In a nomenclature proposal published in 2010 monocytes were subdivided into classical and non-classical cells and in addition an intermediate monocyte subset was proposed. Over the last couple of years many studies have analyzed these intermediate cells, their characteristics have been described, and their expansion has been documented in many clinical settings. While these cells appear to be in transition from classical to non-classical monocytes and hence may not form a distinct cell population in a strict sense, their separate analysis and enumeration is warranted in health and disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 335 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 322 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 27%
Student > Master 49 15%
Researcher 42 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 10%
Student > Bachelor 27 8%
Other 47 14%
Unknown 47 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 77 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 53 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 12%
Sports and Recreations 7 2%
Other 21 6%
Unknown 53 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,719,717
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#5,151
of 31,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,257
of 288,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#58
of 503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.