↓ Skip to main content

Costimulatory Molecules on Immunogenic Versus Tolerogenic Human Dendritic Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
417 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Costimulatory Molecules on Immunogenic Versus Tolerogenic Human Dendritic Cells
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00082
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mario Hubo, Bettina Trinschek, Fanny Kryczanowsky, Andrea Tuettenberg, Kerstin Steinbrink, Helmut Jonuleit

Abstract

Dendritic cells (DC) are sentinels of immunity, essential for homeostasis of T cell-dependent immune responses. Both functions of DC, initiation of antigen-specific T cell immunity and maintenance of tissue-specific tolerance originate from distinct stages of differentiation, immunogenic versus tolerogenic. Dependent on local micro milieu and inflammatory stimuli, tissue resident immature DC with functional plasticity differentiate into tolerogenic or immunogenic DC with stable phenotypes. They efficiently link innate and adaptive immunity and are ideally positioned to modify T cell-mediated immune responses. Since the T cell stimulatory properties of DC are significantly influenced by their expression of signal II ligands, it is critical to understand the impact of distinct costimulatory pathways on DC function. This review gives an overview of functional different human DC subsets with unique profiles of costimulatory molecules and outlines how different costimulatory pathways together with the immunosuppressive cytokine IL-10 bias immunogenic versus tolerogenic DC functions. Furthermore, we exemplarily describe protocols for the generation of two well-defined monocyte-derived DC subsets for their clinical use, immunogenic versus tolerogenic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 417 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 402 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 102 24%
Student > Master 61 15%
Researcher 49 12%
Student > Bachelor 47 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 48 12%
Unknown 87 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 92 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 58 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 9%
Engineering 9 2%
Other 34 8%
Unknown 92 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2021.
All research outputs
#5,239,707
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#5,737
of 31,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,307
of 288,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#65
of 503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.