↓ Skip to main content

Thymic Versus Induced Regulatory T Cells – Who Regulates the Regulators?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Thymic Versus Induced Regulatory T Cells – Who Regulates the Regulators?
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00169
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanni Antonio Maria Povoleri, Cristiano Scottà, Estefania Andrea Nova-Lamperti, Susan John, Giovanna Lombardi, Behdad Afzali

Abstract

Physiological health must balance immunological responsiveness against foreign pathogens with tolerance toward self-components and commensals. Disruption of this balance causes autoimmune diseases/chronic inflammation, in case of excessive immune responses, and persistent infection/immunodeficiency if regulatory components are overactive. This homeostasis occurs at two different levels: at a resting state to prevent autoimmune disease, as autoreactive effector T-cells (Teffs) are only partially deleted in the thymus, and during inflammation to prevent excessive tissue injury, contract the immune response, and enable tissue repair. Adaptive immune cells with regulatory function ("regulatory T-cells") are essential to control Teffs. Two sets of regulatory T cell are required to achieve the desired control: those emerging de novo from embryonic/neonatal thymus ("thymic" or tTregs), whose function is to control autoreactive Teffs to prevent autoimmune diseases, and those induced in the periphery ("peripheral" or pTregs) to acquire regulatory phenotype in response to pathogens/inflammation. The differentiation mechanisms of these cells determine their commitment to lineage and plasticity toward other phenotypes. tTregs, expressing high levels of IL-2 receptor alpha chain (CD25), and the transcription factor Foxp3, are the most important, since mutations or deletions in these genes cause fatal autoimmune diseases in both mice and men. In the periphery, instead, Foxp3(+) pTregs can be induced from naïve precursors in response to environmental signals. Here, we discuss molecular signatures and induction processes, mechanisms and sites of action, lineage stability, and differentiating characteristics of both Foxp3(+) and Foxp3(-) populations of regulatory T cells, derived from the thymus or induced peripherally. We relate these predicates to programs of cell-based therapy for the treatment of autoimmune diseases and induction of tolerance to transplants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 204 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 23%
Researcher 31 14%
Student > Master 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 40 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 39 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 10%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 45 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2013.
All research outputs
#19,975,266
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#22,642
of 31,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,440
of 289,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#240
of 503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.