↓ Skip to main content

Is Arthropod Saliva the Achilles’ Heel of Vector-Borne Diseases?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is Arthropod Saliva the Achilles’ Heel of Vector-Borne Diseases?
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00255
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wolfgang W. Leitner, Tonu Wali, Adriana Costero-Saint Denis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Professor 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 22%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2013.
All research outputs
#7,959,659
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#9,535
of 31,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,897
of 288,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#100
of 503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.