↓ Skip to main content

The Gastrointestinal Frontier: IgA and Viruses

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Gastrointestinal Frontier: IgA and Viruses
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00402
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah E. Blutt, Margaret E. Conner

Abstract

Viral gastroenteritis is one of the leading causes of diseases that kill ~2.2 million people worldwide each year. IgA is one of the major immune effector products present in the gastrointestinal tract yet its importance in protection against gastrointestinal viral infections has been difficult to prove. In part this has been due to a lack of small and large animal models in which pathogenesis of and immunity to gastrointestinal viral infections is similar to that in humans. Much of what we have learned about the role of IgA in the intestinal immune response has been obtained from experimental animal models of rotavirus infection. Rotavirus-specific intestinal IgA appears to be one of the principle effectors of long term protection against rotavirus infection. Thus, there has been a focus on understanding the immunological pathways through which this virus-specific IgA is induced during infection. In addition, the experimental animal models of rotavirus infection provide excellent systems in which new areas of research on viral-specific intestinal IgA including the long term maintenance of viral-specific IgA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 113 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 19%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 31%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 16 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,800,920
of 25,515,042 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#7,183
of 31,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,249
of 289,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#76
of 503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,515,042 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.