↓ Skip to main content

An Update on PYRIN Domain-Containing Pattern Recognition Receptors: From Immunity to Pathology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Update on PYRIN Domain-Containing Pattern Recognition Receptors: From Immunity to Pathology
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00440
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rojo A. Ratsimandresy, Andrea Dorfleutner, Christian Stehlik

Abstract

Cytosolic pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) sense a wide range of endogenous danger-associated molecular patterns as well as exogenous pathogen-associated molecular patterns. In particular, Nod-like receptors containing a pyrin domain (PYD), called NLRPs, and AIM2-like receptors (ALRs) have been shown to play a critical role in host defense by facilitating clearance of pathogens and maintaining a healthy gut microflora. NLRPs and ALRs both encode a PYD, which is crucial for relaying signals that result in an efficient innate immune response through activation of several key innate immune signaling pathways. However, mutations in these PRRs have been linked to the development of auto-inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. In addition, they have been implicated in metabolic diseases. In this review, we summarize the function of PYD-containing NLRPs and ALRs and address their contribution to innate immunity, host defense, and immune-linked diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 136 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 22%
Researcher 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 16 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 35%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 23 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,811,561
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#1,664
of 31,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,378
of 288,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#17
of 503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.