↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of Mouse NK Cell Development and Function by Cytokines

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regulation of Mouse NK Cell Development and Function by Cytokines
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00450
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antoine Marçais, Sébastien Viel, Morgan Grau, Thomas Henry, Jacqueline Marvel, Thierry Walzer

Abstract

Natural Killer (NK) cells are innate lymphocytes with an important role in the early defense against intracellular pathogens and against tumors. Like other immune cells, almost every aspects of their biology are regulated by cytokines. Interleukin (IL)-15 is pivotal for their development, homeostasis, and activation. Moreover, numerous other activating or inhibitory cytokines such as IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-10, IL-12, IL-18, IL-21, Transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) and type I interferons regulate their activation and their effector functions at different stages of the immune response. In this review we summarize the current understanding on the effect of these different cytokines on NK cell development, homeostasis, and functions during steady-state or upon infection by different pathogens. We try to delineate the cellular sources of these cytokines, the intracellular pathways they trigger and the transcription factors they regulate. We describe the known synergies or antagonisms between different cytokines and highlight outstanding questions in this field of investigation. Finally, we discuss how a better knowledge of cytokine action on NK cells could help improve strategies to manipulate NK cells in different clinical situations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 190 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 23%
Researcher 45 23%
Student > Master 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 9%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 28 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 46 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 33 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#24,747
of 31,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,822
of 289,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#318
of 503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.