↓ Skip to main content

Allergy to Uncommon Pets: New Allergies but the Same Allergens

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Allergy to Uncommon Pets: New Allergies but the Same Allergens
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00492
Pubmed ID
Authors

Araceli Díaz-Perales, David González-de-Olano, Marina Pérez-Gordo, Carlos Pastor-Vargas

Abstract

The prevalence of exotic pet allergies has been increasing over the last decade. Years ago, the main allergy-causing domestic animals were dogs and cats, although nowadays there is an increasing number of allergic diseases related to insects, rodents, amphibians, fish, and birds, among others. The current socio-economic situation, in which more and more people have to live in small apartments, might be related to this tendency. The main allergic symptoms related to exotic pets are the same as those described for dog and cat allergy: respiratory symptoms. Animal allergens are therefore, important sensitizing agents and an important risk factor for asthma. There are three main protein families implicated in these allergies, which are the lipocalin superfamily, serum albumin family, and secretoglobin superfamily. Detailed knowledge of the characteristics of allergens is crucial to improvement treatment of uncommon-pet allergies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 44 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Professor 4 9%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,190,131
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#2,115
of 31,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,410
of 289,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#21
of 503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.