↓ Skip to main content

Armed Therapeutic Viruses – A Disruptive Therapy on the Horizon of Cancer Immunotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
10 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Armed Therapeutic Viruses – A Disruptive Therapy on the Horizon of Cancer Immunotherapy
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00074
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maxine Bauzon, Terry Hermiston

Abstract

For the past 150 years cancer immunotherapy has been largely a theoretical hope that recently has begun to show potential as a highly impactful treatment for various cancers. In particular, the identification and targeting of immune checkpoints have given rise to exciting data suggesting that this strategy has the potential to activate sustained antitumor immunity. It is likely that this approach, like other anti-cancer strategies before it, will benefit from co-administration with an additional therapeutic and that it is this combination therapy that may generate the greatest clinical outcome for the patient. In this regard, oncolytic viruses are a therapeutic moiety that is well suited to deliver and augment these immune-modulating therapies in a highly targeted and economically advantageous way over current treatment. In this review, we discuss the blockade of immune checkpoints, how oncolytic viruses complement and extend these therapies, and speculate on how this combination will uniquely impact the future of cancer immunotherapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 97 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 22 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 25 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,542,974
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#2,521
of 31,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,345
of 319,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#7
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.