↓ Skip to main content

T-Cell Immunity to Infection with Dengue Virus in Humans

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
T-Cell Immunity to Infection with Dengue Virus in Humans
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00093
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela Weiskopf, Alessandro Sette

Abstract

Dengue virus (DENV) is the etiologic agent of dengue fever, the most significant mosquito-borne viral disease in humans. Up to 400 million DENV infections occur every year, and severity can range from asymptomatic to an acute self-limiting febrile illness. In a small proportion of patients, the disease can exacerbate and progress to dengue hemorrhagic fever and/or dengue shock syndrome, characterized by severe vascular leakage, thrombocytopenia, and hemorrhagic manifestations. A unique challenge in vaccine development against DENV is the high degree of sequence variation, characteristically associated with RNA viruses. This is of particular relevance in the case of DENV since infection with one DENV serotype (primary infection) presumably affords life-long serotype-specific immunity but only partial and temporary immunity to other serotypes in secondary infection settings. The role of T cells in DENV infection and subsequent disease manifestations is not fully understood. According to the original antigenic sin theory, skewing of T-cell responses induced by primary infection with one serotype causes less effective response upon secondary infection with a different serotype, predisposing to severe disease. Our recent study has suggested an HLA-linked protective role for T cells. Herein, we will discuss the role of T cells in protection and pathogenesis from severe disease as well as the implications for vaccine design.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 203 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 23%
Student > Bachelor 32 15%
Student > Master 27 13%
Researcher 24 11%
Other 10 5%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 44 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 40 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 12%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 46 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2020.
All research outputs
#20,105,174
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#22,864
of 31,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,324
of 236,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#51
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.