↓ Skip to main content

Contribution of Human FcγRs to Disease with Evidence from Human Polymorphisms and Transgenic Animal Studies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contribution of Human FcγRs to Disease with Evidence from Human Polymorphisms and Transgenic Animal Studies
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00254
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caitlin Gillis, Aurélie Gouel-Chéron, Friederike Jönsson, Pierre Bruhns

Abstract

The biological activities of human IgG antibodies predominantly rely on a family of receptors for the Fc portion of IgG, FcγRs: FcγRI, FcγRIIA, FcγRIIB, FcγRIIC, FcγRIIIA, FcγRIIIB, FcRL5, FcRn, and TRIM21. All FcγRs bind IgG at the cell surface, except FcRn and TRIM21 that bind IgG once internalized. The affinity of FcγRs for IgG is determined by polymorphisms of human FcγRs and ranges from 2 × 10(4) to 8 × 10(7) M(-1). The biological functions of FcγRs extend from cellular activation or inhibition, IgG-internalization/endocytosis/phagocytosis to IgG transport and recycling. This review focuses on human FcγRs and intends to present an overview of the current understanding of how these receptors may contribute to various pathologies. It will define FcγRs and their polymorphic variants, their affinity for human IgG subclasses, and review the associations found between FcγR polymorphisms and human pathologies. It will also describe the human FcγR-transgenic mice that have been used to study the role of these receptors in autoimmune, inflammatory, and allergic disease models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 185 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 21%
Student > Master 17 9%
Other 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 38 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 29 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 46 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2019.
All research outputs
#8,261,756
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#10,113
of 31,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,912
of 240,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#32
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.