↓ Skip to main content

Beyond NK Cells: The Expanding Universe of Innate Lymphoid Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Beyond NK Cells: The Expanding Universe of Innate Lymphoid Cells
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00282
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marina Cella, Hannah Miller, Christina Song

Abstract

For a long time, natural killer (NK) cells were thought to be the only innate immune lymphoid population capable of responding to invading pathogens under the influence of changing environmental cues. In the last few years, an increasing amount of evidence has shown that a number of different innate lymphoid cell (ILC) populations found at mucosal sites rapidly respond to locally produced cytokines in order to establish or maintain homeostasis. These ILC populations closely mirror the phenotype of adaptive T helper subsets in their repertoire of secreted soluble factors. Early in the immune response, ILCs are responsible for setting the stage to mount an adaptive T cell response that is appropriate for the incoming insult. Here, we review the diversity of ILC subsets and discuss similarities and differences between ILCs and NK cells in function and key transcriptional factors required for their development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 134 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 26%
Researcher 28 20%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 8 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 33%
Immunology and Microbiology 38 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Linguistics 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 11 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,896,698
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#9,352
of 31,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,048
of 229,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#37
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.