↓ Skip to main content

Human to Mosquito Transmission of Dengue Viruses

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
557 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human to Mosquito Transmission of Dengue Viruses
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00290
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren B. Carrington, Cameron P. Simmons

Abstract

The successful transmission of dengue virus from a human host to a mosquito vector requires a complex set of factors to align. It is becoming increasingly important to improve our understanding of the parameters that shape the human to mosquito component of the transmission cycle so that vaccines and therapeutic antivirals can be fully evaluated and epidemiological models refined. Here we describe these factors, and discuss the biological and environmental impacts and demographic changes that are influencing these dynamics. Specifically, we examine features of the human infection required for the mosquito to acquire the virus via natural blood feeding, as well as the biological and environmental factors that influence a mosquito's susceptibility to infection, up to the point that they are capable of transmitting the virus to a new host.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 557 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 539 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 101 18%
Student > Master 78 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 13%
Researcher 64 11%
Student > Postgraduate 33 6%
Other 74 13%
Unknown 133 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 122 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 87 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 75 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 40 7%
Environmental Science 13 2%
Other 69 12%
Unknown 151 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,055,117
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#7,773
of 31,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,149
of 242,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#29
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.