↓ Skip to main content

Extracellular Adenosine-Mediated Modulation of Regulatory T Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extracellular Adenosine-Mediated Modulation of Regulatory T Cells
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00304
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akio Ohta, Michail Sitkovsky

Abstract

Extracellular adenosine-dependent suppression and redirection of pro-inflammatory activities are mediated by the signaling through adenosine receptors on the surface of most immune cells. The immunosuppression by endogenously-produced adenosine is pathophysiologically significant since inactivation of A2A/A2B adenosine receptor (A2AR/A2BR) and adenosine-producing ecto-enzymes CD39/CD73 results in the higher intensity of immune response and exaggeration of inflammatory damage. Regulatory T cells (Treg) can generate extracellular adenosine, which is implicated in the immunoregulatory activity of Tregs. Interestingly, adenosine has been shown to increase the numbers of Tregs and further promotes their immunoregulatory activity. A2AR-deficiency in Tregs reduces their immunosuppressive efficacy in vivo. Thus, adenosine is not only directly and instantly inhibiting to the immune response through interaction with A2AR/A2BR on the effector cells, but also adenosine signaling can recruit other immunoregulatory mechanisms, including Tregs. Such interaction between adenosine and Tregs suggests the presence of a positive feedback mechanism, which further promotes negative regulation of immune system through the establishment of immunosuppressive microenvironment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 246 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 15%
Student > Master 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 27 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 9%
Other 49 19%
Unknown 44 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 48 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 4%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 47 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2014.
All research outputs
#15,740,505
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#15,380
of 31,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,791
of 240,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#57
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.