↓ Skip to main content

Communication between Human Dendritic Cell Subsets in Tuberculosis: Requirements for Naive CD4+ T Cell Stimulation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Communication between Human Dendritic Cell Subsets in Tuberculosis: Requirements for Naive CD4+ T Cell Stimulation
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00324
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Lozza, Maura Farinacci, Marina Bechtle, Manuela Stäber, Ulrike Zedler, Andrea Baiocchini, Franca del Nonno, Stefan H. E. Kaufmann

Abstract

Human primary dendritic cells (DCs) are heterogeneous by phenotype, function, and tissue localization and distinct from inflammatory monocyte-derived DCs. Current information regarding the susceptibility and functional role of primary human DC subsets to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection is limited. Here, we dissect the response of different primary DC subsets to Mtb infection. Myeloid CD11c(+) cells and pDCs (C-type lectin 4C(+) cells) were located in human lymph nodes (LNs) of tuberculosis (TB) patients by histochemistry. Rare CD141(hi) DCs (C-type lectin 9A(+) cells) were also identified. Infection with live Mtb revealed a higher responsiveness of myeloid CD1c(+) DCs compared to CD141(hi) DCs and pDCs. CD1c(+) DCs produced interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor α, and IL-1β but not IL-12p70, a cytokine important for Th1 activation and host defenses against Mtb. Yet, CD1c(+) DCs were able to activate autologous naïve CD4(+) T cells. By combining cell purification with fluorescence-activated cell sorting and gene expression profiling on rare cell populations, we detected in responding CD4(+) T cells, genes related to effector-cytolytic functions and transcription factors associated with Th1, Th17, and Treg polarization, suggesting multifunctional properties in our experimental conditions. Finally, immunohistologic analyses revealed contact between CD11c(+) cells and pDCs in LNs of TB patients and in vitro data suggest that cooperation between Mtb-infected CD1c(+) DCs and pDCs favors stimulation of CD4(+) T cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 55 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Student > Master 10 18%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 6 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2014.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#16,705
of 31,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,403
of 241,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#65
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.