↓ Skip to main content

Mucosal Resident Memory CD4 T Cells in Protection and Immunopathology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mucosal Resident Memory CD4 T Cells in Protection and Immunopathology
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00331
Pubmed ID
Authors

Damian Lanz Turner, Donna L. Farber

Abstract

Tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM) comprise a newly defined subset, which comprises a major component of lymphocyte populations in diverse peripheral tissue sites, including mucosal tissues, barrier surfaces, and in other non-lymphoid and lymphoid sites in humans and mice. Many studies have focused on the role of CD8 TRM in protection; however, there is now accumulating evidence that CD4 TRM predominate in tissue sites, and are integral for in situ protective immunity, particularly in mucosal sites. New evidence suggests that mucosal CD4 TRM populations differentiate at tissue sites following the recruitment of effector T cells by local inflammation or infection. The resulting TRM populations are enriched in T-cell specificities associated with the inducing pathogen/antigen. This compartmentalization of memory T cells at specific tissue sites may provide an optimal design for future vaccination strategies. In addition, emerging evidence suggests that CD4 TRM may also play a role in immunoregulation and immunopathology, and therefore, targeting TRM may be a viable therapeutic approach to treat inflammatory diseases in mucosal sites. This review will summarize our current understanding of CD4 TRM in diverse tissues, with an emphasis on their role in protective immunity and the mechanisms by which these populations are established and maintained in diverse mucosal sites.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 206 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 27%
Researcher 49 23%
Student > Master 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 27 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 64 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 <1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 30 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#24,741
of 31,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,921
of 241,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#100
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.